Eu4 Dynamic Province Names
I would like to know why paradox didnt care about dynamic province names.(They are in the common folder, so they de-ironman saves if you dare the edit that localisation file)For example the latin entry have just 6 names. The funny fact is that even the home land provinces owned by Savoy, Milan and Venice at game start have english names.I guess they are busy with coding serious stuff, but on workshop and even here on the forum there are MANY files of MANY dynamic province names made by modders and by people who have that mothertongue, so they are quite accurate.The funny thing is that paradox staff should only COPY and PASTE those files in the vanilla folder, and the 'problem' is gone. It would take less than 1 minute.I always thought that we southern europeans were the lazy part of Europe: we prefer to eat, drink, party and monkey around probably because the hot climate, the landscapes and our traditions which bring us to spend time with people. (we have +1 diplomatic slot )unless you are south european (in this case you can delay this request as long as you prefer ) what about copy and paste those already done dynamic names mods in the vanilla game? REGARDING VENETIAN RULERS:Venice in 1444 starts with 'Francesco Foscarini' but he should be named 'Francesco Foscari'.REGARDING SIENESE RULERS:In CountryHistory files they have ' John Galeazzo' and ' John Maria'.Those rulers are THE SAME in Milan history file. Stats and names are different.
Expansions to EU4. Custom Client Countries Diplomatic Tech 22 Custom Names / Coat of Arms / Color / Government New War Options Sortie from Castles to oppose sieges Transfer occupation of a province to other nations Set Objectives (Provinces) to participating nations Improved Diplomacy Sell Ship Option Declare War for Subject CB Declare War in.
Eu4 Province Id Map
The Milanese Names are good. The Sienese are not.
Good names should be copypaste from Milan history files: ' Gian Galeazzo I' and ' Giovanni Maria I'.REGARDING FLORENTINE RULERS:In history files there is ' Giovanni I'The Name 'Giovanni I' is wrong. He was no king. So he should be only named 'Giovanni'.The most accurate title of the ruler of Florence should be 'SIGNORE' that mean 'LORD' (gender female is 'signora'). This can be the case for Florence with 'oligarchic republic' government form.The actual title of Cosimo 'Gonfaloniere Cosimo de'Medici' should be 'Signore Cosimo de'Medici'.REGARDING URBINESE RULERS:In History file there is ' Gidantonio I'.'
Gidantonio' is wrong. It is 'Guidantonio'The Current Ruler Name IS WRONG TOO. It should be ' Federico' and not ' Federigo'.-OTHERS SUGGESTIONS:REGARDING LUCCA:The ruler title should be 'Gonfaloniere' and not 'Doge'.Doge is the ruler title for 'merchant republics' like Venice and Genoa. Lucca never had a doge.REGARDING SIENA:Government is something like the swiss syndic, but 'Gonfaloniere' should be the ruler name and not 'Doge'. Siena never had a doge.REGARDING VENICE, GENOA and FLORENCE 'ELECTIONS':I can only suggest a total overhaul of the system.Venetian and Genoese doge ruled until death. You can simulate the elections for the 'factions' but the leader should not change.
They require they own government form.The same is for FLORENCE. Cosimo ruled until he died (like a dictatorship tbh). There were no 'elections' during his reign. Florence require his own government form probably.REGARDING FERRARA:There was no 'duchy of Ferrara' since it was a 'marquisate'. Speaking in game terms 'a government rank even lower than duchy'.They can have the title of 'marquis' instead of 'duke'. Not a big deal anyway.After 30 years in game they upgraded in Duchy.REGARDING SARDINIA:The tag SAR have the 'Sardinia' label.
Eu4 Dynamic Province Names List
Click to expand.I am not an expert on the subject, perhaps it was an error by the creator of the map.Are you suggesting removing the H from the province names? I don't think your example is very good, as H is a different sound from TH.Anyway, looking at some other maps from the 17th century, it can be seen that Aberdeen is spelled as 'Aberdone'. So, if the shire part gets dropped, the province could be called Aberdone.On these two maps, it can be seen that 'Lothian' is 'Laudonia', which I suppose does strengthen your point however I don't understand why a Latin map would have had places written as 'Lothiana' and 'Sutherlandia'? I am not an expert on the subject, perhaps it was an error by the creator of the map.Are you suggesting removing the H from the province names? I don't think your example is very good, as H is a different sound from TH.Anyway, looking at some other maps from the 17th century, it can be seen that Aberdeen is spelled as 'Aberdone'. So, if the shire part gets dropped, the province could be called Aberdone.On these two maps, it can be seen that 'Lothian' is 'Laudonia', which I suppose does strengthen your point however I don't understand why a Latin map would have had places written as 'Lothiana' and 'Sutherlandia'?
Click to expand.To be more precise: I would suggest not using these dynamic province names at all.' H' ( in Italian acca) is nowadays used to. indicate how c, g and sc are pronounced. distinguish some forms of avere (to have) from other similiar words: ho hai ha hanno from o ai a and anno.Often only cities of (historical) importance have names in other languages. And just introducing new dynamical province names for the sake of adding sth is not the way to go. Italian maps of the UK only depict Italian names for London, Dublin and Edinborough. I also looked up Lothian and Sitherland in Wiki and there tjey are not translated aswell.
Click to expand.We dont need any hefty debates, I'm not speaking for nationalistic stuff, but only for geographical concepts.For example some patches ago the baleares were in Italian Region. Such a mistake!Yes, i know it was politically part of Austria but you also say 'since this was the political classification'.I've no problem in leaving sudtirol in german area but I wont classify 'areas' according to political situation.I would let you notice that Savoy, in example, is politically in Italy at that time but paradox prefer (and I prefer too) to let savoy be in french area.The same can be for Venetian holding:'Domini di Terraferma' includes Istria and Dalmatia. They politically in Venice, but I wont claim that Dalmatia is in the Italian area.If areas are georaphic concepts, sudtirol should be in Italy. Instead, if areas are political concepts. Well there is a lot of areas that must be changed. We dont need any hefty debates, I'm not speaking for nationalistic stuff, but only for geographical concepts.For example some patches ago the baleares were in Italian Region.
Such a mistake!Yes, i know it was politically part of Austria but you also say 'since this was the political classification'.I've no problem in leaving sudtirol in german area but I wont classify 'areas' according to political situation.I would let you notice that Savoy, in example, is politically in Italy at that time but paradox prefer (and I prefer too) to let savoy be in french area.The same can be for Venetian holding:'Domini di Terraferma' includes Istria and Dalmatia. They politically in Venice, but I wont claim that Dalmatia is in the Italian area.If areas are georaphic concepts, sudtirol should be in Italy. Instead, if areas are political concepts. Well there is a lot of areas that must be changed.
This section may contain outdated information that is inaccurate for the current of the game. The last version it was verified as up to date for was 1.21.Allow players to play the same country If on, players can control the same country. Not possible with Ironman enabledOnly host can save If on, only the host will be able to save a multiplayer gameEditable savegame If on, players can manually edit saved game files between sessionsLocked ledger If on, players will not be able to open the ledger, preventing usage of it for seeing other countries' armiesCustom setup.